Link Search Menu Expand Document

Appendix: Origins of Moral Psychology

Developmental research indicates that developmental origins of moral psychology can be found even in preverbal infants.

This recording is also available on stream (no ads; search enabled). Or you can view just the slides (no audio or video). You should not watch the recording this year, it’s all happening live (advice).

If the video isn’t working you could also watch it on youtube. Or you can view just the slides (no audio or video). You should not watch the recording this year, it’s all happening live (advice).

If the slides are not working, or you prefer them full screen, please try this link.

The recording is available on stream and youtube.

Notes

We did not cover this in the 2023–24 lectures, but I have included it as an appendix for the few people who may have special reasons be interested.

moral sense: a ‘tendency to see certain actions and individuals as right, good, and deserving of reward, and others as wrong, bad, and deserving of punishment’ (Hamlin, 2013, p. 186).

Hamlin’s three requirements for having a moral sense:

  • prosociality (helpfulness towards others)

  • discrimination between pro- and anti-social acts

  • retribution

‘infants are making relatively complex and sophisticated social judgments in the first year of life. They not only evaluate others based on the local valence of their behavior, they are also sensitive to the global context in which these behaviors occur. During the second year, young toddlers direct their own valenced acts toward appropriate targets.’ (Hamlin, Wynn, Bloom, & Mahajan, 2011, p. 19933)

‘developmental research supports the claim that at least some aspects of human morality are innate. From extremely early in life, human infants show morally relevant motivations and evaluations—ones that are mentalistic, are nuanced, and do not appear to stem from socialization or morally specific experience’ (Hamlin, 2013, p. 191).

Poverty of Stimulus Arguments

How do poverty of stimulus arguments work? See Pullum & Scholz (2002).

  1. Human infants acquire X.

  2. To acquire X by data-driven learning you'd need this Crucial Evidence.

  3. But infants lack this Crucial Evidence for X.

  4. So human infants do not acquire X by data-driven learning.

  5. But all acquisition is either data-driven or innately-primed learning.

  6. So human infants acquire X by innately-primed learning .

‘the APS [argument from the poverty of stimulus] still awaits even a single good supporting example’ (Pullum & Scholz, 2002, p. \ 47). Since then (2002), a single example has been found (Lidz, Waxman, & Freedman, 2003). But just one, as far as I can tell (in 2021).

Ask a Question

Your question will normally be answered in the question session of the next lecture.

More information about asking questions.

Glossary

moral sense : A ‘tendency to see certain actions and individuals as right, good, and deserving of reward, and others as wrong, bad, and deserving of punishment’ (Hamlin, 2013, p. 186).

References

Hamlin, J. K. (2013). Moral Judgment and Action in Preverbal Infants and Toddlers: Evidence for an Innate Moral Core. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412470687
Hamlin, J. K. (2014). Context-dependent social evaluation in 4.5-month-old human infants: The role of domain-general versus domain-specific processes in the development of social evaluation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00614
Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., Bloom, P., & Mahajan, N. (2011). How infants and toddlers react to antisocial others. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(50), 19931–19936. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1110306108
Lidz, J., & Waxman, S. (2004). Reaffirming the poverty of the stimulus argument: A reply to the replies. Cognition, 93(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.02.001
Lidz, J., Waxman, S., & Freedman, J. (2003). What infants know about syntax but couldn’t have learned: Experimental evidence for syntactic structure at 18 months. Cognition, 89(3), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00116-1
Pullum, G. K., & Scholz, B. C. (2002). Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. The Linguistic Review, 18(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.19.1-2.9